
Top Stories 
Published On January 24, 2018
TECHNOLOGY
Into the Depths
The first endoscope went on display with the help of a talented sideshow performer.
One measure of medicine’s progress is how far inside a living human body the physician can peer. Before X-rays and other imaging technologies, that job fell to ingenious devices and the naked eye. One of the most significant advances happened when a series of 19th-century innovations encountered the services of a professional sword swallower.
The idea of an endoscope—a tube that could be engineered to look deep inside the body—may have started with the “Lichtleiter,” or light conductor, conceptualized by Phillip Bozzini in 1806. This improved on the more primitive speculum by adding a mirror, a wax candle and a series of “viewing tubes” that could peer into orifices. A major advance on this idea came in 1853, when Parisian urologist Antonin Desormeaux used a tube, a kerosene lamp and a concave mirror to reflect light into the urethra, allowing for the first examination of the bladder.
Adolph Kussmaul, a physician from the University of Heidelberg in Germany, wanted to apply Desormeaux’s technique to observing the gastrointestinal tract. The son of a country doctor, Kussmaul had already, in 1845, come up with a device that inverted the lens design of a simple telescope and was supposed to show the interior of the eye. The ophthalmoscope had only one defect, he asserted—namely, that nothing could be seen with it.
Kussmaul added a straight tube, about nine inches long, to Desormeaux’s design and attempted to snake it down the throat of a man to locate a tumor. Unfortunately the limitations of the man’s esophagus prevented Kussmaul from getting the device deep enough. That’s when he turned to a man with an unusual talent: sword swallowing.
In a 1901 account by Gustav Killian, a student of Kussmaul, the doctor discovered an entertainer—allegedly known as “The Iron Henry”—who was able to relax his throat to an impressive degree. This allowed Kussmaul to insert an 18.5-inch tube with ease, thereby performing the first endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract in 1868, 150 years ago.
Kussmaul then performed his innovative examination before audiences at several medical societies. One drawing that may have been based on this depicts the doctor sinking the scope down a patient’s throat, then laying him down on a raised table, head thrown back. The physician is shown squatting next to the table and peering through one end of the instrument.
Those unaccustomed to swallowing swords had a difficult time tolerating the device, and it afforded limited visibility at best. Despite these drawbacks, Kussmaul is recognized for scoring a major advance in the field.
Dispatches

What Makes a Kid Clumsy? More research into coordination disorders shows why some children are more prone to trip, fumble and spill the milk.

Eyes in the Sky Satellite data can be used to assess the health impact of dust storms and the spread of mosquito-borne diseases. Additional applications could be on the horizon.

Could This One Change Help Curb the Opioid Crisis? To prescribe an effective bridge to addiction treatment, emergency physicians must get special training and receive a waiver. Making that process easier—or eliminating the requirement altogether—could make a big impact.

One Thing Leads to the Next Robert Lefkowitz is best known for revealing the mechanism behind hundreds of drugs in use today. But he thinks of himself as a storyteller first and has a new book out to make his case.

Podcast: The Research Year That Was Medical research labs have faced a difficult stretch of closed buildings and competing priorities. Yet they have also produced milestone discoveries—and not only on COVID-19.

The Shape of Us Two milestone discoveries in protein modeling promise to change the fundamentals of drug discovery.

Universal Flu Vaccines Move Forward In the shadow of coronavirus vaccine development, another vaccine was making solid progress.

Top Stories 

The Neuroscience of Giving Up
Why do some people react poorly, even catastrophically, in emergency situations?