Stay on the Frontiers of Medicine.

Sign up for a free subscription to Proto.
mgh-logo
functionbar_help
Site Help
Font Size
Large Text
functionbar_contact
Contact Us
functionbar_aboutus
About Us
functionbar_legal
Archive
Search Results for “

Not finding what you're looking for? Articles from older issues of Proto can be found here.

Share
SEARCH RESULTS FOR “

Sorry, no results found.

Published On May 03, 2013

Policy

A Premium on Gender

Insurers attribute higher premiums for women than men of the same age because of the increased cost of women’s care.

Insurers have actuarial reasons for charging some groups of people more than others—old more than young, smokers more than nonsmokers—and even for refusing to grant insurance to people with pre-existing conditions. One disparity causing particular ire is that between women and men of the same age. Women don’t choose to be born female, so why, ask critics, do insurers of individuals penalize women by charging them premiums that are higher than what men the same age pay, and hit small companies with higher fees for their female employees? Says Judy Waxman, vice president of health and reproductive rights for the National Women’s Law Center, “We should be sharing the risk across genders, just as we do across races.”

The Affordable Care Act prohibits gender rating beginning in 2014. But the U.S. Supreme Court is due to decide in June whether some of the law’s provisions are unconstitutional—and a ruling against the law could mean insurers’ gender ratings are here to stay.

 

 

 

See More Actionlink-arrow
Share